If you are the owner of American pit bull Terrier, South African Boerboel, Karelian bear dog, Anatolian Karabash, American Staffordshire Terrier, Caucasian shepherd, Alabai (and mixes of these breeds), you should prepare for in the near future they can be equated to the traumatic weapon. With all the consequences from incorrect ownership of such a “weapon”.
To the State Duma for the second reading (it is expected that it will be held in this parliamentary session) the bill “About responsible treatment of animals”, where the owners of the above “potentially dangerous” fighting dogs is mandatory to register them and undergo pre-training in the treatment of them. In addition, as written in the bill, “the owner of a potentially dangerous dog breeds over 18 months must have a certificate confirming the passage of the General dog training course (dog training),” and walking these dogs without a muzzle and without a leash is prohibited everywhere, even in the designated dog walking areas.
By the way, once it came to fighting breeds. The bill prohibits the organization of fights of animals, including human, and even “passionatecutie” (presence) on these fights — what would animals for any purpose as fighters, though the roosters, even dogs, and all other circuses, in which animals can cause injuries, too, fall under the ban.
However, short stories about dogs fighting breeds and the rules of conduct with them is just a small part of the draft law. It mentions a variety of animals.
“Pets”, or, in the usual way, Pets. There are chapters on farm animals; commensal (wild, which doesn’t contain people, but they live in conditions fully or partly created by human activities); office and so on.
Someone will be indignant that MPs strive to regulate, but not to argue that abnormal is just the current situation, when in this area of regulation is not at all. The pet owner should be responsible for his fate and the negative impact of your pet on the surrounding world. Continue reading
The theme of the day Unless sanctions are imposed, not to revoke? The end of March is a very “jubilee” in terms military interventions in the world. So, on March 21, 2011 began bombing Libya by NATO forces. 24 March 1999 – bombing of Yugoslavia. There is an opinion that the Yugoslav and the Libyan scenario fail and Russia and its leadership, but against this background of a TV broadcast to the citizens the idea that “strategic partners” economic sanctions should be canceled any day now. At least the European, at least the ones that hung over the Donbass, will cancel exactly. Here and U.S. Secretary of state John Kerry, say, two whole days were spent in Moscow, understood the Americans, then they were wrong. But it was the policy of appeasement and rapprochement has always been the main instrument of Western aggression, not sanctions. Yesterday decided to recall how it happened.
“The government of Primakov and Gerashchenko Maslukov was a government of professionals, as opposed to the current” Exactly 17 years ago – March 24, 1999 occurred one of the most significant events in the recent history of Russia and its foreign policy. A prominent politician Yevgeny Maximovich Primakov made the legendary “turn over the Atlantic”, showing the world the power of sovereignty in the background of Yeltsin’s lack of will. The independence and professionalism accept restyleable and in the actions of the government under the leadership of Primakov. The unique experience of ex-Premier and his colleagues – Yury Maslukov and Victor Gerashchenko has enabled the withdrawal of the country from the abyss in 1998, However, modern financial power, those sensible ideas ignore.
Oleg Smirnov: If, in Rostov there was a catastrophe in Kazan is already a crime! There is not just to remove the responsible officials, they should be put in prison. If found technical inconsistencies – need to revoke the certificates for the Boeing 737 and Refine them. Of course, this will entail costs. Any designer, and especially Boeing, will defend itself with terrible force. And he can do it. Continue reading
What happens if you have a home thirty-six cats , five giant dogs , a terrarium or a rabbit farm on your balcony ? Knowrealty versed in the intricacies of the law.
If you delve into history, the path of domestication of wild animals stood our very distant ancestors. In the stone age arrive to man the wolf was turned into a dog, and 10 thousand years ago the Hittites domesticated cat. In those days no one had any issues, is it possible to have this animal specifically, was distracted by more pressing worries: how to do, or to put together a fighting chariot. Genghis Khan, for example, or Charles the Great, setting the stage for the Cheetah, not exactly tormented by questions like that to the neighbors. But with them is more or less clear: the kings and khans all can. What about us, the ordinary residents of the flats in the block, sometimes without balconies? Those who have no HOMESTEAD land and even a small country cottage? Can someone forbid to make, say, an anteater, if outrageous just like Salvador Dali, and much less square meters?
The law, ironically, not particularly regulates the rules of keeping a pet in the apartment, but imposes a few simple requirements . The main thing is that he really lived in the apartment, but not in the hallway or in the stairwell, so as not celebrating estestvennuyu in the entrance, and that the statutory silence about the time didn’t disturb neighbors by barking/hissing/curlykale. This is the basic provisions prescribed in the “Code of the city of Moscow on administrative offences”, for their failure to pay the fine. Continue reading